Which group argued that a Bill of Rights should be added to the Constitution?

Which group argued that a Bill of Rights should be added to the Constitution?

• A. Anti-Federalists
• B. Federalists
• C. Neither
• D. Both

Answer: (A)

Protecting individual liberties with a written guarantee is the main idea here. The Anti-Federalists argued that the new Constitution did not adequately safeguard personal rights, so they pressed for a Bill of Rights—explicit protections for freedoms like speech, religion, and due process. Their push helped lead to the inclusion of the first ten amendments, which limit the federal government’s powers and protect basic rights. While Federalists believed the Constitution already limited government and could be amended later, the Anti-Federalist demand for a Bill of Rights was a crucial factor in securing ratification in several states.

Protecting individual liberties with a written guarantee is the main idea here. The Anti-Federalists argued that the new Constitution did not adequately safeguard personal rights, so they pressed for a Bill of Rights—explicit protections for freedoms like speech, religion, and due process. Their push helped lead to the inclusion of the first ten amendments, which limit the federal government’s powers and protect basic rights. While Federalists believed the Constitution already limited government and could be amended later, the Anti-Federalist demand for a Bill of Rights was a crucial factor in securing ratification in several states.